Page 9 - Community Living Issue 31-3
P. 9

living a life: sex, marriage and the law

        move upon their personal privacy, yet
        such a move was in its essentials     Conclusions: consent and welfare concerns
        entirely lawful and properly motivated.
        As I have said, perhaps it is part of the   Laying down any clear   experimentation or   matters such as the
        inevitable price that must be paid to   test for capacity in   simply hunger for    differing possible
        have a regime of effective           relation to sex is a    attention, love or     consequences of sex for
        safeguarding.”                       multifaceted problem. It   comfort.            men and women, and the
                                             all depends on the facts.   There is social    differing impact of
        The safeguarding implications of this   It is hard to define   ambivalence about the   sterilisation (usually
       case are:                             consent on paper given   range of sexual acts –   irrevocable in women,
       ● ●Despite the “presumption” of capacity,   the range of contexts and   from the ordinary straight  potentially reversible
        the local authority’s safeguarding   motives for people      or gay, through to the   in men).
        responsibilities were properly regarded   without cognitive   unusual, to the well out   The underlying purpose
        as triggered in relation to the married   impairment to willingly   of the ordinary and into   of criminal law is different
        couple’s assumed intimacies.         participate in a sexual   fetishism – if there is no   from civil law, and
       ● ●Not even Making Safeguarding Personal   activity – many of us   apparent unwilling victim.  prosecution and actions
        (Local Government Association, 2017)   might accede to         It is almost impossible   for civil assault have
        could have been used to prevent the   deliberately abusive   to separate welfare    different standards of
        council from doing as it did, because the   treatment through   concerns from the strict   proof for public policy
        evidence about capacity was not      ignorance, openness to   question of capacity in   reasons.
        contradicted, which gave the council a
        reasonable belief that the man was
        subject to abuse.                      “If you believe my husband lacks   The tabloid press might find the idea of
       ● ●Safeguarding cannot work without a   capacity and you intend to tell other   women in care homes having a right to
        lower threshold than certainty being   people about that in the context of   sex if they have capacity unseemly or
        applicable to section 42 enquiries, given   safeguarding, you need to get it declared  inappropriate, especially if others deem the
        the parallel operation of the        to be the case by a competent court   woman vulnerable. But the presumption
        presumption of capacity.             because he is presumed to be capable   of capacity applies to everyone, and the
       ● ●However, as the KA case showed in our   and the psychologist is only expressing a  Care Quality Commission says care homes
        last issue (Schwehr, 2017) a competent   view with which I do not happen to agree.  should be homely.
        medical expert can be overruled by a   “I intend to go on offering him the   For this reason, a degree of legal literacy
        judge in a capacity decision. Whether   opportunity to have sex with me unless   really matters for adult social health and
        one’s level of functioning refutes the   or until you take proper procedural   care clients. The distinction between what
        presumption of capacity is ultimately a   steps to clarify your position.   constitutes a sexual crime or a civil assault,
        legal judgment. An expert opinion on   criminal offence, I will have a   as opposed to conduct that carries risks but
                                               “If I am arrested by the police for a
                                                                                can be managed as an issue of maximising
        capacity is not an absolute determinant.
      “                                      reasonable belief in my husband’s   welfare, is part and parcel of person-
                                             willing consent so I am not expecting to
                                                                                centred care planning and provision.
             It is almost impossible
                                             be charged or prosecuted.
                                                                                  Observance of human rights is a duty in all
                                               “If you take steps in the court of
                                                                                care homes, not just of social work staff in
            to separate welfare
          concerns from the strict           protection to get an injunction against   councils or clinical commissioning groups. n
                                             me, or change my loved one’s care plan
          question of capacity in            so as to impact upon our private life,   Belinda Schwehr is chief executive of legal
            matters such as the              that is up to you, but you need to have   advice charity CASCAIDr (www.CASCAIDr.
                                             taken on board my views about his
                                                                                org.uk) and owner of the Care & Health
          consequences of sex for            capacity and best interests (because I   Law consultancy. She has been a barrister,
                                    ”                                           References
              men and women                  am a statutory best interests consultee),  a solicitor advocate and a university law
                                                                                lecturer
                                             in order to have any hope of success.”
                                             This approach could be used, in adapted
       Possible action by spouse           form, by any third party in a situation like   CH v A Metropolitan Council [2017] EWCOP12
       What about WH’s loss of conjugal    this where a person is potentially unfairly   Local Government Association (2017) Making
       relations in this case?             regarded as a possible perpetrator of any   Safeguarding Personal. www.local.gov.uk/
        The report states that she pursued a   type of abuse, particularly if the   topics/social-care-health-and-integration/
       claim under the Human Rights Act 1998,   relationship is close.          adult-social-care/making-safeguarding-personal
                                                                                Schwehr B (2017) What is the law on capacity
       which was settled on confidential terms.                                 to have sex? Community Living. 31(2): 10-11
        What else could CH’s wife have done,   Legal literacy in social care
       considering that nobody in this case   Consider, however, if this had been an
       suggested that the psychologist’s   elderly woman with dementia in a care   This article is the second of a two-part
       assessment was wrong?               home, whose husband’s entrenched view   series. Part one highlighted the case of
        It would have taken a brave and    was that she still knew him as her    KA, a person with a rudimentary
       well-informed person to say the following,  husband, and could consent to sex after   understanding of sex, who was presumed
       but she could in theory have written to   50 years of marriage – would the press   capable of consenting (Schwehr B, 2017)
       the council as follows:             coverage be critical of a “nanny” council?

       www.cl-initiatives.co.uk                                               Community Living  Vol 31 No 3  |  Spring 2018  9
   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14