Page 23 - Community Living Magazine 31 - 4
P. 23

service provision

       recognises and respects diversity and
       plurality in the social process of care.
        Finally, it argues against inequalities in
       the giving and receipt of care. It
       recognises these inequalities may be
       constituted through different
       characteristics, including sex, disability,
       age, ethnic origin, nationality, class and
       occupational status, sexuality, religion and
       marital status.
        Care requires time, financial and
       practical support and the recognition
       of choices. These extend beyond income
       maintenance, benefits and social services
       to include public space, transport and
       policies to address discrimination
       and poverty.

       A department of social care?
       To prevent a collapse of the social care
       system, I would argue for the creation of a
       single government department
       responsible for just social care.
        Such a department would establish the
       principles and guidelines for social care.   Does doctor know best when it comes to running services? Health and social care have different
       Furthermore, the operation of the system   roles and priorities
       would be devolved to regional councils in
       a system comparable to that in Sweden,   ● ●Public support – the knowledge that    created, then we need to seek micro
       which existed in the UK before 1974. It’s   the money paid on taxes will go directly   solutions which foster localism and
       worth noting that reorganisation in 1974   to some needed service (social care)   community endeavour and enable people
       was intended to reduce the amount of   can help to reduce the dissatisfaction    to truly take back control of their lives.
       money spent on public services and to   of the population with an increase    If such action is not taken, there is a
       ensure increased efficiency, neither of   in taxes                       strong probability that an Americanised
       which was achieved.                 ● ●Protecting resources – earmarking can   health and social care system will emerge,
        The establishment of a central       protect resources for financing social   which fails the overwhelming majority of
       government department of social care can   care from being spent on something else.  the population but has minimal impact on
       happen only if sufficient financial   If taxpayers are aware that a dedicated   the moneyed few.
       resources are made available. In my   amount is set aside to fund a particular   The kind of reforms briefly touched on
       opinion, the best option would be to   service, such as social care, there is a high   here are unlikely to be brought about by
       increase income tax in a discriminating   probability that they will be supportive of   any of the major political parties.
       manner – as in Scandinavia – or to   such a measure.                     However, as a result of the fractious and
       introduce a social care tax. The UK is   It would be incumbent upon the   fracturing pressures within the different
       behind the overwhelming majority of   government to demonstrate that the   political parties over brexit, we may see
       western European countries in the   hypothecated tax was being used for the   the emergence of a new progressive
       amount allocated to social expenditure; it   purposes agreed.            political alliance with a radical and strong
       was the only rich eU country to cut                                      community-oriented agenda. There is
       welfare spending as a proportion of GDP   Collapse and its consequences  then a glimmer of hope. n
       between 2011 and 2014.              Unless major reforms of the kind very   ● You can download Robin Jackson’s full
        A strong case has been made by for   briefly touched upon here are      report, Reforming Social Care, published
    Berit/Wikimedia Commons; Alex Proimos/Wikimedia Commons
       introducing a hypothecated tax where the   implemented, there is a high probability   by the Centre for Welfare Reform at www.
       revenues from the tax go to financing a   that social care in England will collapse.   centreforwelfarereform.org/news/
       particular service such as social care   The consequences of that for the social   report-on-hore-published/00370.html
       (Keable-elliott, 2014). This approach has a   fabric of the country will be disastrous.
       number of advantages:               For a society already characterised by   Robin Jackson is an author and
       ● ●Transparency – hypothecated taxation   increasingly sharp social divisions, the loss  commentator on social care and learning
        makes the link between revenues from   of an effective social care system to   disability and a visiting research fellow at
        taxes and government spending more   support the disadvantaged could well   the University of Hertfordshire
        visible                            prompt civil unrest and disorder.
       ● ●Accountability and trust – hypothecated   The problem has been that successive   Keable-elliott I (2014) Hypothecated Taxation
        taxes may help when the government is   governments of all political persuasions   and the NHS. London: CentreForum
        not trusted. With hypothecation, the   have misguidedly placed their faith in   Williams F (2003) Reforming Social Care.
        government will have to follow a plan   solving problems by attempting macro   Paper presented to the Annual Conference of
        made in advance and will have no   solutions, none of which have worked.   the Finnish Social Policy Association, 24
        flexibility                          If a genuinely caring society is to be   October 2003

       www.cl-initiatives.co.uk                                            Community Living  Vol 31 No 4  |  Summer 2018  23
   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28